<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for David Otton</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otton.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otton.org</link>
	<description>Look! Bunnies!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:50:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by alex williams</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26833</link>
		<dc:creator>alex williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:50:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26833</guid>
		<description>even worse than above,whilst batteries being recharged, wife shut and locked door on my sf20.obviosley now wont open</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>even worse than above,whilst batteries being recharged, wife shut and locked door on my sf20.obviosley now wont open</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by Marion Pralet</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26832</link>
		<dc:creator>Marion Pralet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:41:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26832</guid>
		<description>The Nutool SF10 came with a set of emergency keys. You remove panel between knob and digital panel, under this panel is a lock which you can then undo with the key. 
The problem I have now is have changed the batteries for new, but it still has no power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Nutool SF10 came with a set of emergency keys. You remove panel between knob and digital panel, under this panel is a lock which you can then undo with the key.<br />
The problem I have now is have changed the batteries for new, but it still has no power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by Pat Hill</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26828</link>
		<dc:creator>Pat Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 13:12:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26828</guid>
		<description>Had the same problem  Stood the safe against a radiator with key pad touching it.Left there for approx 48hrs  The heat charged batteries enough to open safe. Good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the same problem  Stood the safe against a radiator with key pad touching it.Left there for approx 48hrs  The heat charged batteries enough to open safe. Good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by Jen Williams</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26697</link>
		<dc:creator>Jen Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 11:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26697</guid>
		<description>Same problems as above!! Has anyone any instructions to help!
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same problems as above!! Has anyone any instructions to help!<br />
Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by Mal Watts</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26576</link>
		<dc:creator>Mal Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26576</guid>
		<description>Same as above! Do you remember how you &quot;cracked&quot; the safe as Nutool are no longer trading &amp; i can&#039;t get answers/copy of manual anywhere!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Same as above! Do you remember how you &#8220;cracked&#8221; the safe as Nutool are no longer trading &amp; i can&#8217;t get answers/copy of manual anywhere!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid PHP Tricks: (true == false) by Webspace Creations</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2008/08/06/stupid-php-tricks-true-false-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-26432</link>
		<dc:creator>Webspace Creations</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 2009 17:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=172#comment-26432</guid>
		<description>When something as basic as comparisons do not function as expected, this is a serious problem and it is a problem that hackers are exploiting RIGHT NOW. Programmers aren&#039;t lazy, they want a consistent programming environment. Many are coming from strict languages like C/C++. An expression like (&#039;1a&#039; == 1) should not evaluate as true. Loose typing would mean that (&#039;1&#039; == 1) evaluates as true, but PHP tries too hard to make an expression work and the === convention is an oddity (meaning any programmer with real experience is going to be unfamiliar with it). Weak typing is fine, but fundamental operations, such as comparisons, should work in a consistent and predictable way if we&#039;re going to get serious about building secure web apps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When something as basic as comparisons do not function as expected, this is a serious problem and it is a problem that hackers are exploiting RIGHT NOW. Programmers aren&#8217;t lazy, they want a consistent programming environment. Many are coming from strict languages like C/C++. An expression like (&#8216;1a&#8217; == 1) should not evaluate as true. Loose typing would mean that (&#8216;1&#8242; == 1) evaluates as true, but PHP tries too hard to make an expression work and the === convention is an oddity (meaning any programmer with real experience is going to be unfamiliar with it). Weak typing is fine, but fundamental operations, such as comparisons, should work in a consistent and predictable way if we&#8217;re going to get serious about building secure web apps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid PHP Tricks: Illegal Variable Names by 網站製作學習誌 &#187; [Web] 連結分享</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2008/08/21/stupid-php-tricks-illegal-variable-names/comment-page-1/#comment-26156</link>
		<dc:creator>網站製作學習誌 &#187; [Web] 連結分享</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=235#comment-26156</guid>
		<description>[...] Stupid PHP Tricks: Illegal Variable Names [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Stupid PHP Tricks: Illegal Variable Names [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on More switch() Abuse &#8211; Switching on Multiple Values by Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/11/22/more-php-switch-abuse-switching-on-multiple-values/comment-page-1/#comment-26137</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 10:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=400#comment-26137</guid>
		<description>You can:

switch(true) {
  case $a === true &amp;&amp; $b === true :
  break;
}

If you need identicality (awesome new word). Certain you already know this, but just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You can:</p>
<p>switch(true) {<br />
  case $a === true &amp;&amp; $b === true :<br />
  break;<br />
}</p>
<p>If you need identicality (awesome new word). Certain you already know this, but just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Stupid PHP Tricks: (true == false) by pbean</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2008/08/06/stupid-php-tricks-true-false-comparison/comment-page-1/#comment-26108</link>
		<dc:creator>pbean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:21:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=172#comment-26108</guid>
		<description>=== to the rescue... I have been using it more and more. But in my opinion the whole language is a mess and should get a big overhaul. Just have a look at these different kinds of constructs which can, in some situations, do the same or worse have completely unexpected behavior:

if (isset($a)) ...
if (is_null($a)) ...
if ($a == null) ...
if ($a === null) ...
if ($a) ...
if (!!$a) ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>=== to the rescue&#8230; I have been using it more and more. But in my opinion the whole language is a mess and should get a big overhaul. Just have a look at these different kinds of constructs which can, in some situations, do the same or worse have completely unexpected behavior:</p>
<p>if (isset($a)) &#8230;<br />
if (is_null($a)) &#8230;<br />
if ($a == null) &#8230;<br />
if ($a === null) &#8230;<br />
if ($a) &#8230;<br />
if (!!$a) &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Instructions for opening Nutool SF5, SF10 and SF20 safes by Raymond Warrender</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2009/10/02/instructions-for-opening-nutool-sf5-sf10-and-sf20-safes/comment-page-1/#comment-26059</link>
		<dc:creator>Raymond Warrender</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 20:54:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/?p=393#comment-26059</guid>
		<description>I have same problem and as batteries are inside safe how did you overcome problem?

Raymond</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have same problem and as batteries are inside safe how did you overcome problem?</p>
<p>Raymond</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
