<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for www.otton.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.otton.org/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.otton.org</link>
	<description>Look! Bunnies!</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 20:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on There&#8217;s weakly-typed, then there&#8217;s PHP: TRUE == FALSE by Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.otton.org/2006/04/20/php-weakly-typed-consequences/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 14:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.otton.org/2006/04/20/php-weakly-typed-consequences/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>I really don't know how I would get on with a language that does not check type compatibility at compile time. I find it useful when Pascal fails at compile time if two variables are incompatible. I gives me one less thing to worry about and hopefully makes the code less buggy ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#8217;t know how I would get on with a language that does not check type compatibility at compile time. I find it useful when Pascal fails at compile time if two variables are incompatible. I gives me one less thing to worry about and hopefully makes the code less buggy ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
